The included picture was taken by my grandfather in the early 1930s in Alaska. I scanned the image immediately after he gave it to me last week. I wish to remain anonymous since I don't want anything to do with any research or whatever on this.
I know it looks like an alien or a Bigfoot and I know my grandfather was telling me the truth about him taking this picture. That's why I think it should be in the right hands.
Thanks in advance,
The only additional information is contained on the bottom of the full size image, which tells us the following:
The picture was taken in the early 1930s by the sender's grandfather, who lived in Alaska. The entity was first seen when the grandfather was on his way to a lake. He chased the entity until he got close enough to take this one picture. It was some 4 months before the photograph was developed, being in a remote, sparsely populated area.
To say the least, It was a this mysterious message. What could this image be? After being downloaded, and viewed for a few moments, It was known it would be controversial to say the least. Little was it known that there would be more than one mystery to solve. Begriming the task of selecting and cutting the area around the small creature, there were thoughts of:
Wouldn't it be something if this was the real thing, even though it may never be proven as such?
What if this gentleman's grandfather had really filmed a creature from another world, and this was the proof.
Excitement was only tempered by the thought of not being able to prove it one way or the other. Soon there would be a second mystery faced.
After doing a couple of trial runs, and relatively pleased with the results, considering the fact that the scanned image was from a photograph approximately 70 years old. And looking through several of the cutouts made, There was maybe something else. The entity's right lower arm/hand region seemed to be obscured, by what? So the original was re scanned, working on that particular area. What was finally seen, was a second, even smaller entity. Is it possible that we had a female with her child?
The sender never asked for a thing, money or publishing rights, just that the photo be put in good hands.
There is no definite answer as to what we are looking at here. It is one of 3 things:
1) An outright hoax, someone in a suit.
2) A single unknown being, origin unknown, and we are without a way to go any further toward discovery.
3) Number 2, with 2 beings. All is not lost, and just like beauty being in the eye of the beholder, so is the result of what we have here.